The
Making of Images Themselves that I am Concerned about Interviewer:
Zhu Qi
As one of the outstanding artists born in China in 1970, Xie Nanxing was selected into the 48th Venice Biennial in June of 1999. In his paintings, he portrayed the mental memories of their spiritual injuries that the young generation of the 1990s have in their hearts. The viewers are panic-stricken at his metaphorical paintings which have a strong visual shock and his method of expressions has embodied the new experimentations and understanding of the young generation of artists on their concepts of paintings. For the newly-created works in 2000, his paintings have become unusually tranquil. The topic of the following dialogue starts from such a change in his paintings.
A: I am used to make some anticipations of the next series
of painting when I am busy with the current paintings. The
anticipation is the most important. If I have no anticipation
when I finish my works, then, basically speaking, it is the
time for me to break off from the arts. Moreover, the second
series of paintings are the continuation and improvement of
the experiences of the first ones. For example of the images
of the exaggerated injuries, the power of such images depends
upon how to fill in with contents including the light and
the facial expressions of the characters, just like the shooting
of a film.
Q: Where did the experiences of injuries come from at that
time? You looked quite calm by your appearance, but the
paintings were quite different from your appearance. Did
the injuries come from your personal experiences or from
the common experiences of your generation?
A: Maybe from both sides, but more from my personal
experiences. I don't prefer to making the social culture into
a certain concept. What I am mainly concerned about is my
personal feelings. We, as individuals, are like small fish
in a river and the conditioned reaction of the fish in the
water is same as the experiences and imprints in the society.
I am making a false impression in my paintings and the current
paintings are a further step from the first batch of false
impressions. The sense of false impressions in my earliest
works is much in evidence. You will find it a false impression
among whatever works of art.
Q:Is it a false impression in your imagination or the one directed
against the current realities?
A: It should be aimed at the realities. The false impression
is an impossible reality.
Q:Does the experiences of injury in the first series of paintings
not belong to the injury from the reality to you?
A: The reality is an injury to me, but I have built
up a landscape of injuries in a psychological way. Anything
can be a real injury as long as it exerts any influences
on your psychology and you will keep it in your mind to
the end of your life. If it is a traffic accident, then
the injury will not be so profound as it is.
A: In comparison with the last generation, there
are neither much physical cruelty and injury, nor great
ideological tides and trends for this generation, but the
injury in their inner world of this generation is quite
delicate. Why is the delicate state of minds is expressed
so strongly in your paintings?
A:This is a rhetoric method. There was a period of
"the Scar Art" in China at the end of 1970s. Under
the cloak of realism and romanticism, the art was expressed
in a comparatively delicate method of rhetoric, but I think
it did not reach to their basic intentions. At the beginning
of 1990s, the artists were hurt more profoundly in their
hearts. They tried to make their expressions in the forms
of pop culture and their identities, but it was very difficult
for them to express their original intentions. What they
expressed was an evasion. They escaped reality. The art
means a way to express something that can be expressed the
most impossibly in a linguistic method, but the language
of art is a challenge to the nature.
Q:Have you attained your objective in such a way?
A: Yes. I have asked the viewers about their opinions
on my works. Their answers are almost same. They feel injured.
Some of them remember their experiences and the others think
that the challenge is a terrible thing.
Q:do you feel hurt when you paint in brushes?
A: Yes. I think that it is a challenge to the limit
of my psychology.
Q:Do you wrestle with your paintings everyday?
A: If you want to test the others with your works,
you must pass the test yourself in advance. I think that I
have passed the test. But some people may not pass such a
test. They are afraid to be confronted with my paintings.
This is a reality which is constituted with images. I think
that I am aggressive in the creations of images. The image
of the art in China is still in a process of simplicity and
low class. I think that I am doing an interesting experiment.
Q:In your first series of paintings, you have painted
the parents and their children in a closed space and the
subtly psychological relationship. Why do you want to create
a depressing image of a family fable?
A: This is an image of grown-up or growing.
Q:Is this a status of growing to be expressed?
A: It is to express the injuries in a very close relationship.
This painting is just like a commemorative photo to convey
a perceivable idea.
Q: Is there any relationship with the individual experiences
in a family?
A: a relationship with my father or my family, but
there is a common experience relative with the problems of
all the families.
Q: Is this painting an unconscious self-analysis?
A: This painting is quite particular, "I"
sitting on a stool look just like a devil or a little bloodsucker.
His body is grown up and he is already an adult, but he is
in a conflict with other adults and it is a subconscious conflict.
Q:There is a quality of division in your painting, but it has
no direct relationship with the social and political images.
Is the contemporary restricted to express the origin of
individual spirit and symptoms?
A: The contemporary art has a broader field. It can
be in this way, or in that way. What I am concerned about
is the emergence, changes, falling, burst and pressing of
individual spirit.
Q:When the ideas become a visual media, what role do they play
in it?
A: The ideas are expressed in the communications. In
my opinion, the ideas have less and less significance and
they are expressed as a linguistic tool, a connecting method
and a kind of grammar.
Q:In your paintings, the realistic method is almost same as
the effect of photography. How do you comprehend about the
realistic concepts in the contemporary paintings?
A: I do not care about the problems of forms relative
with the realistic methods. What I am concerned about is how
to make images and to change the images. Modeling is a traditional
way of painting. I cannot say that my paintings have no relationship
with the photography because I am very fond of photography.
Photography is an exquisite science and a technology which
have no relationship with the objects of expressions. I may
have some imitations of the photography, but the boundary
between the painting and the photography is not so important
as before. The painting and the photography are naturally
different.
Q:What does Harald Szeeman think of your paintings?
A: He thinks that my paintings have a power. He prefers
the results.
Q: Does he think that there is a political experience
in the paintings of the Chinese painters he has selected?
A: Certainly. It is unavoidable in such a country like
China. The paintings of Qi Baishi would also be regarded a
political symbol if they were exhibited in the West.
Q: Why have your current paintings become a silent corner?
A: The new series of paintings of mine is to paint
a comparatively silent environment. This is a step forward
for my linguistic practices. I'd like to make some researches
on the relationship between the visual metaphors and the reading,
which needs a routine form of silence.
Q: But in these paintings, the narrative elements are few and
there is nothing to read in the end except personal experiencing.
A: Experiencing should also be a narrative method.
The techniques in these paintings are a warm method. You may
enter the paintings relaxedly. You may find some realistically
imitated details in the paintings and many fabricated relationship
may be coming to you ceaselessly. You may accept these things,
but, first of all, you must read the paintings for some minutes,
then, you will think that these are the scenes that you are
quite familiar with, but you cannot look at them in a routine
way of psychology.
Q:Do you think that you have entered a field of pure languages?
The reason is that the paintings today seem to have already
deleted all the injuries of the past and the autophilia,
the memories of the youth and wet dreams.
A: The status of pure languages that you have mentioned
is more correct.
Q:What is the difference between the pure language and the
pure art?
A: The pure language is a method to eliminate the artistic
status. The pure art is an old concept, a concept about aesthetics.
The status of the pure language should be beyond the limit
of aesthetics.
Q: Is there no aesthetics in the paintings today?
A:I do not hope that there is aesthetics and make our
efforts to eliminate the aesthetics and the artistry relative
with the paintings. Creating a meaningless picture and the
contents of the picture may have other functions. But for
the art, it has no meaning.
Q:What remains in the paintings?
A: You may find some traces of the narrations and the
art itself, but it is impossible to eliminate the art completely.
It is also a very foolish idea.
Q:What should the art be? What was the art that you wanted
to eliminate?
A:I wanted to eliminate the system of painting on the
shelf and transform it into a psychological preparation for
painting without any shelves, but you can have a psychological
status of looking at a painting on the shelf. A part of the
possible picture will play a role as the effects of a painting,
but you may not think it as a painting, thus eliminating the
possibility of painting on the shelf. But I have found that
what I have done is actually almost same as the free-hand
paintings of mountains and water in the Chinese traditional
paintings. It is nothing but creating a false impression.
Q: Is it to create a false impression with a on-the-shelf painting?
A:Yes. Painting on the shelf has left less and less
work for the artists and many people dare not to set foot
on the shelf because there is no more aesthetics for discussion
in them. There is no really newer aesthetics and it is no
other than the ceaseless copies of the former aesthetical
system. Many people have regarded the on-the-shelf painting
as a very dangerous field. But I would try to seek more if
there was a little possibility.
Q: Do you think that the pure language belongs to the realist
realm?
A:Maybe. If the realist language is not enough, it
has to be supplemented and extended. It is very important.
We cannot say that the realist language has already come to
an end, but we may say that the development of the language
in that system in that era was prohibited. Therefore, it would
not have more changes, but it does not mean the death of a
thing. Learning from the images and learning from the newer
things is ceaselessly continuing. Only the new visual experiences
and experiences of expressions can be extended. I am quite
optimistic about my work, but such a work can only be done
by a few people, just like the scientific researches.
Q: Do you have a passion in your paintings today?
A: Now my paintings have become more stretching and
profound, just like images and poetry. It is an expression
of memories.
Q: But such preference is becoming much farther from the exaggerated
culture at present?
A: But the paintings are quite visual. You will not
find that there is no visual affections in my paintings. What
I prefer is not only the rhythmical changes which may be strong
or smooth, but also the imagery poetry with meanings and attractions.
That is the poetry of the language itself, not the poetry
in a lyrical sense. What I am concerned about is the creation
of image itself.